The Surgical Learning Curve for Prostate Cancer Control After Radical Prostatectomy
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 24 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 99 (15) , 1171-1177
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djm060
Abstract
The learning curve for surgery—i.e., improvement in surgical outcomes with increasing surgeon experience—remains primarily a theoretical concept; actual curves based on surgical outcome data are rarely presented. We analyzed the surgical learning curve for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. The study cohort included 7765 prostate cancer patients who were treated with radical prostatectomy by one of 72 surgeons at four major US academic medical centers between 1987 and 2003. For each patient, surgeon experience was coded as the total number of radical prostatectomies performed by the surgeon before the patient’s operation. Multivariable survival–time regression models were used to evaluate the association between surgeon experience and prostate cancer recurrence, defined as a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of more than 0.4 ng/mL followed by a subsequent higher PSA level (i.e., biochemical recurrence), with adjustment for established clinical and tumor characteristics. All P values are two-sided. The learning curve for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy was steep and did not start to plateau until a surgeon had completed approximately 250 prior operations. The predicted probabilities of recurrence at 5 years were 17.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.1% to 25.6%) for patients treated by surgeons with 10 prior operations and 10.7% (95% CI = 7.1% to 15.9%) for patients treated by surgeons with 250 prior operations (difference = 7.2%, 95% CI = 4.6% to 10.1%; P <.001). This finding was robust to sensitivity analysis; in particular, the results were unaffected if we restricted the sample to patients treated after 1995, when stage migration related to the advent of PSA screening appeared largely complete. As a surgeon's experience increases, cancer control after radical prostatectomy improves, presumably because of improved surgical technique. Further research is needed to examine the specific techniques used by experienced surgeons that are associated with improved outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Black Race Does Not Independently Predict Adverse Outcome Following Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy at a Tertiary Referral CenterJournal of Urology, 2006
- Defining Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Proposal for a Standardized DefinitionJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN THE COMMUNITY SETTING—THE LEARNING CURVE AND BEYOND: INITIAL 200 CASESJournal of Urology, 2005
- VARIATIONS AMONG HIGH VOLUME SURGEONS IN THE RATE OF COMPLICATIONS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: FURTHER EVIDENCE THAT TECHNIQUE MATTERSJournal of Urology, 2005
- Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume as Predictors of Outcome Following Rectal Cancer ResectionAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Variations in Morbidity after Radical ProstatectomyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- New surgical procedures: can we minimise the learning curve?BMJ, 2000
- Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 1998
- The Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Colorectal SurgeryArchives of Surgery, 1997