Development of Health‐Related Waist Circumference Thresholds Within BMI Categories
Open Access
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Obesity Research
- Vol. 12 (7) , 1094-1103
- https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2004.137
Abstract
Objective: To develop and cross‐validate waist circumference (WC) thresholds within BMI categories. The utility of the derived values was compared with the single WC thresholds (women, 88 cm; men, 102 cm) recommended by NIH and Health Canada. Research Methods and Procedures: The sample included adults classified as normal weight (BMI = 18.5 to 24.9), overweight (BMI = 25 to 29.9), obese I (BMI = 30 to 34.9), and obese II+ (BMI ≥ 35) from the Third U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III; n = 11, 968) and the Canadian Heart Health Surveys (CHHS; n = 6286). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the optimal WC thresholds that predicted high risk of coronary events (top quintile of Framingham scores) within BMI categories using the NHANES III. The BMI‐specific WC thresholds were cross‐validated using the CHHS. Results: The optimal WC thresholds increased across BMI categories from 87 to 124 cm in men and from 79 to 115 cm in women. The validation study indicated improved sensitivity and specificity with the BMI‐specific WC thresholds compared with the single thresholds. Discussion: Compared with the recommended WC thresholds, the BMI‐specific values improved the identification of health risk. In normal weight, overweight, obese I, and obese II+ patients, WC cut‐offs of 90, 100, 110, and 125 cm in men and 80, 90, 105, and 115 cm in women, respectively, can be used to identify those at increased risk.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anthropometric Cutoff Points for Predicting Chronic Diseases in the Mexican National Health Survey 2000Obesity Research, 2003
- Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sitesThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2003
- Discrimination of Health Risk by Combined Body Mass Index and Waist CircumferenceObesity Research, 2003
- Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, and Health RiskArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2002
- Sensitivity and Specificity of Anthropometrics for the Prediction of Diabetes in a Biracial CohortObesity Research, 2001
- Validation of the Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Prediction ScoresJAMA, 2001
- Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)JAMA, 2001
- A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors. The Canadian Heart Health SurveysInternational Journal of Obesity, 2001
- Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight managementBMJ, 1995
- Representativeness of the Framingham risk model for coronary heart disease mortality: A comparison with a national cohort studyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987