Evaluation of Genetic Explanations of Reading and Learning Problems
- 1 October 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Journal of Special Education
- Vol. 14 (3) , 365-383
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698001400310
Abstract
Since the end of the last century there have been studies of reading and learning problems which have concluded that a considerable proportion of these difficulties are inherited. This conclusion has been reaffirmed in recent investigations and explications of reading and learning "disabilities." Evidence for a heritability explanation has come from two sources: family and twin studies. An examination of these studies, however, demonstrates that although they appear to use the "scientific method" and are replete with quantified analysis, in fact they offer little substantial evidence for their conclusions. Moreover, they violate principles of logic and hypothesis testing to such an extent that they must be considered to be not merely inadequately scientific, but, indeed, pseudoscientific. Unfortunately, lack of evidence and egregious conclusions have not prevented the dissemination of heritability explanations among professionals and the public.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Spatially Competent LD ChildAcademic Therapy, 1978
- Non-Psychoeducational Foundations of Learning DisabilitiesThe Journal of Special Education, 1977
- A Twin Study of Genetic Influences in Reoding AchievementJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1974
- Reading Disability in TwinsDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1973
- Family Teamwork and PsychotherapyFamily Process, 1966
- Reading Disability as a Condition of Family StabilityFamily Process, 1964
- ABILITIES OF TWINSScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1960
- A NEUROLOGICAL APPRAISAL OF FAMILIAL CONGENITAL WORD-BLINDNESSBrain, 1956
- Specific Reading DisabilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1947
- A Case of Congenital Word BlindnessBMJ, 1896