Minority Blocks and Takeover Premia
- 1 September 2005
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
This paper analyses takeovers of companies owned by atomistic shareholders and by one minority blockholder, all of whom can only decide to tender or retain their shares. As private benefit extraction is ineffcient, the post-takeover share value increases with the bidder's shareholdings. In a successful takeover, the blockholder tenders all his shares and the small shareholders tender the amount needed such that the post-takeover share value matches the bid price. Compared to a fully dispersed target company, the bidder may have to offer a higher price either to win the blockholder's support or to attract enough shares from small shareholders.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Family FirmsThe Journal of Finance, 2003
- Agency Conflicts in Public and Negotiated Transfers of Corporate ControlThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- Toeholds and TakeoversJournal of Political Economy, 1999
- Corporate Takeovers in the Laboratory When Shareholders Own More than One ShareThe Journal of Business, 1998
- Why Higher Takeover Premia Protect Minority ShareholdersJournal of Political Economy, 1998
- Initial Shareholdings and Overbidding in Takeover ContestsThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Efficient and Inefficient Sales of Corporate ControlThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994
- The Role of Asset Structure, Ownership Structure, and Takeover Defenses in Determining Acquisition LikelihoodJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1992
- Successful Takeovers without ExclusionThe Review of Financial Studies, 1988
- Interfirm Tender Offers and the Market for Corporate ControlThe Journal of Business, 1980