Informed Traders as Liquidity Providers: Transparency, Liquidity and Price Formation
Preprint
- 1 January 2003
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
I study the consequences,of pre-trade transparency,on liquidity in an order-driven market,with informed,and uninformed,risk-averse investors and liquidity traders. For a given proportion of informed agents, the more trans- parent the market, the more liquid it is. With endogenous information ac- quisition this result can be reversed, since greater transparency reduces the incentive to acquire information,and thus lowers the equilibrium number,of informed traders. This can reduce liquidity, since in this model informed agents are natural liquidity providers. Informed agents are in a good posi- tion to accommodate the liquidity shocks of liquidity traders, because they are not exposed to adverse selection. That transparency,can have ambiguous consequences,is in line with the results of empirical studies. JEL classiÞcation codes: D82, G28. Keywords: liquidity providers, pre-trade transparency, centralized mar- kets. 2Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rethinking Financial Regulation: How Confusions Have Prevented ProgressSSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
- Who Benefits from an Open Limit‐Order Book?The Journal of Business, 2005
- The 'Make or Take' Decision in an Electronic Market: Evidence on the Evolution of LiquiditySSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
- Can transparent markets survive?Journal of Financial Economics, 2000
- The Quality of the Italian Treasury Bond Market, Asymmetric Information and Transaction CostsAnnales D'economie Et de Statistique, 2000
- Market Transparency: Who Wins and Who Loses?The Review of Financial Studies, 1999
- Market Orders and Market EfficiencyThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- An Integrated Model of Market and Limit OrdersJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1995
- Insider Trading and the Efficiency of Stock PricesThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1992
- Sunshine Trading and Financial Market EquilibriumThe Review of Financial Studies, 1991