On the Feasibility of Multiple Matching Tests— Variations on a Theme by Guiliksen
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 12 (1) , 5-14
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168801200102
Abstract
This paper reports a feasibility study of a new test format-multiple matching (MM). Under this format, distractors from several items are pooled into a single list which appears at the end of the test. The examinees are asked to match one correct answer to each of the items in the test. An experiment is described in which the lengths of the item list and the distractor pool were manipulated. It is shown that construction of MM tests is technically feasible and that these tests achieve satisfactory results in terms of reliability, validity, and reduction of random guessingKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perspective on Educational MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 1986
- OPTIMAL NUMBER OF OPTIONS: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ASSUMPTION OF PROPORTIONALITYJournal of Educational Measurement, 1985
- Willingness to Answer Multiple-Choice Questions as Manifested Both in Genuine and in Nonsense ItemsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
- The Effects of Guessing and Item Dependence on the Reliability and Validity of Recognition Based Cloze TestsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
- Some theories of performance in multiple choice tests, and their implications for variants of the taskBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1982
- Matching and Multiple-Choice Cloze TestsThe Journal of Educational Research, 1979
- AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF LORD'S THEORETICAL RESULTS REGARDING FORMULA SCORING OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1977
- A New Formula ScoreEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
- On Bayesian formula scores for random guessing in multiple choice testsBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1977
- FORMULA SCORING AND NUMBER‐RIGHT SCORING1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975