Quantifying Temporal Glucose Variability in Diabetes via Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Mathematical Methods and Clinical Application
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 7 (6) , 849-862
- https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2005.7.849
Abstract
Background: Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) collect detailed blood glucose (BG) time series, which carry significant information about the dynamics of BG fluctuations. In contrast, the methods for analysis of CGM data remain those developed for infrequent BG self-monitoring. As a result, important information about the temporal structure of the data is lost during the translation of raw sensor readings into clinically interpretable statistics and images. Methods: The following mathematical methods are introduced into the field of CGM data interpretation: (1) analysis of BG rate of change; (2) risk analysis using previously reported Low/High BG Indices and Poincare (lag) plot of risk associated with temporal BG variability; and (3) spatial aggregation of the process of BG fluctuations and its Markov chain visualization. The clinical application of these methods is illustrated by analysis of data of a patient with Type 1 diabetes mellitus who underwent islet transplantation and with data from clinical trials. Results: Normative data [12,025 reference (YSI device, Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, OH) BG determinations] in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus who underwent insulin and glucose challenges suggest that the 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence intervals of BG rate of change that could be maximally sustained over 15–30 min are [–2,2], [–3,3], and [–4,4] mg/dL/min, respectively. BG dynamics and risk parameters clearly differentiated the stages of transplantation and the effects of medication. Aspects of treatment were clearly visualized by graphs of BG rate of change and Low/High BG Indices, by a Poincare plot of risk for rapid BG fluctuations, and by a plot of the aggregated Markov process. Conclusions: Advanced analysis and visualization of CGM data allow for evaluation of dynamical characteristics of diabetes and reveal clinical information that is inaccessible via standard statistics, which do not take into account the temporal structure of the data. The use of such methods improves the assessment of patients' glycemic control.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Continuous Glucose MonitoringDiabetes Care, 2005
- Evaluating the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose-Monitoring SensorsDiabetes Care, 2004
- The Accuracy of the GlucoWatch®G2™Biographer in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Results of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Accuracy StudyDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2003
- The Accuracy of the CGMS™in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Results of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Accuracy StudyDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2003
- Hypoglycemia in DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2003
- Performance of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During Controlled Hypoglycaemia in Healthy VolunteersDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2002
- Hypoglycaemia: The limiting factor in the glycaemic management of Type I and Type II Diabetes*Diabetologia, 2002
- Mortality from Coronary Heart Disease in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and in Nondiabetic Subjects with and without Prior Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM: the Diabetes Intervention Study, 11-year follow-upDiabetologia, 1996
- Lessons From the Diabetes Control and Complications TrialDiabetes, 1993