TWO PITFALLS IN ASSESSING FAIRNESS OF SELECTION TESTS USING THE REGRESSION MODEL
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 35 (3) , 601-607
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02212.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE VALIDITY and FAIRNESS OF EMPLOYMENT and EDUCATIONAL TESTS FOR HISPANIC AMERICANS: A REVIEW and ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 1980
- THE FUTURE OF CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDITY1Personnel Psychology, 1980
- THE STATISTICAL DEFINITION OF FAIRNESS IN THE FEDERAL SELECTION GUIDELINES AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MINORITY EMPLOYMENTPersonnel Psychology, 1979
- Single-group validity, differential validity, and differential prediction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- TESTING FOR FAIRNESS WITH A MODERATED MULTIPLE REGRESSION STRATEGY: AN ALTERNATIVE TO DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS1Personnel Psychology, 1978
- Single-group validity, differential validity, and differential prediction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- Fairness of psychological tests: Implications of four definitions for selection utility and minority hiring.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Critical analysis of the statistical and ethical implications of various definitions of test bias.Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- TEST BIAS: PREDICTION OF GRADES OF NEGRO AND WHITE STUDENTS IN INTEGRATED COLLEGESJournal of Educational Measurement, 1968