Institutional support for peer contact in distance education: An empirical investigation
- 4 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Distance Education
- Vol. 10 (1) , 7-27
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791890100103
Abstract
Two hypotheses derived from Keegan's theoretical framework of reintegration in distance education formed the focus for this investigation. Opportunities for peer contact and support were re‐integrated into an existing distance education program for the purpose of affecting achievement, self‐perception of learning achievement, final academic standing (including non‐completion), and attitudes. The analysis was conducted in two parts; one based on an experimental sample and the other based on a larger general sample. No significant differences were found between levels of the experimental variable, but peer contact was found to significantly discriminate between levels of both course completion and final academic standing in one of the targeted courses based on the general sample.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Designing for diversity: Are field-dependent learners less suited to distance education programs of instruction?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1987
- The Interrelationship Between Support and Learning MaterialsPLET: Programmed Learning & Educational Technology, 1986
- A study of the relationship between telephone contact and persistenceDistance Education, 1984
- The cognitive style of field‐dependence as an explanatory construct in distance education drop‐outDistance Education, 1984
- The Seminar as an Instructional Strategy in Distance EducationBritish Journal of Educational Technology, 1984
- Reconsidering Research on Learning from MediaReview of Educational Research, 1983
- Distance students' learning — empirical findings and theoretical deliberationsDistance Education, 1982
- The Influence of Varied Teacher Behavior on Performance in Correspondence StudyThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1963