Some Limitations and Pitfalls of Excretory Urography
- 31 October 1976
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 116 (5) , 537-543
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)58903-x
Abstract
A review of some of the more important limitations and pitfalls in the interpretation of excretory urograms [human] is presented. Although there is no infallible method of avoiding interpretive errors it is suggested that the development of good viewing habits, including an orderly and systematic appraisal of each film, coupled with a physiologically oriented approach to film interpretation will reduce mistakes significantly. Similarly, many pitfalls may be circumvented by close collaboration between urologist and radiologist and by the reluctance of either to accept urography that is suboptimal by current standards.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Spectrum of Renal Tubular Ectasia and Hepatic FibrosisRadiology, 1975
- Aberrant Renal Papilla: A Diagnostic DilemmaJournal of Urology, 1975
- Radionuclide Imaging in Renal PseudotumorsRadiology, 1974
- Carcinoma of the Ureter-a Review of 54 CasesBritish Journal of Urology, 1973
- RENAL PSEUDOTUMORS: THE REGENERATED NODULE AND OTHER LUMPS, BUMPS, AND DROMEDARY HUMPSAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1969
- UrographyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1969
- The Routine Use of Higher Volumes of Contrast Material to Improve Intravenous UrographyRadiology, 1964
- Drip Infusion PyelographyRadiology, 1964
- Intravenous Urography in the Patient with Renal InsufficiencyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1963
- Intravenous Pyelography in Children with Renal InsufficiencyRadiology, 1962