Effectiveness of Common Household Cleaning Agents in Reducing the Viability of Human Influenza A/H1N1
Open Access
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 5 (2) , e8987
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008987
Abstract
In the event of an influenza pandemic, the majority of people infected will be nursed at home. It is therefore important to determine simple methods for limiting the spread of the virus within the home. The purpose of this work was to test a representative range of common household cleaning agents for their effectiveness at killing or reducing the viability of influenza A virus. Plaque assays provided a robust and reproducible method for determining virus viability after disinfection, while a National Standard influenza virus RT-PCR assay (VSOP 25, www.hpa-standardmethods.org.uk) was adapted to detect viral genome, and a British Standard (BS:EN 14476:2005) was modified to determine virus killing. Active ingredients in a number of the cleaning agents, wipes, and tissues tested were able to rapidly render influenza virus nonviable, as determined by plaque assay. Commercially available wipes with a claimed antiviral or antibacterial effect killed or reduced virus infectivity, while nonmicrobiocidal wipes and those containing only low concentrations (<5%) of surfactants showed lower anti-influenza activity. Importantly, however, our findings indicate that it is possible to use common, low-technology agents such as 1% bleach, 10% malt vinegar, or 0.01% washing-up liquid to rapidly and completely inactivate influenza virus. Thus, in the context of the ongoing pandemic, and especially in low-resource settings, the public does not need to source specialized cleaning products, but can rapidly disinfect potentially contaminated surfaces with agents readily available in most homes.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of Soap and Water and Alcohol‐Based Hand‐Rub Preparations against Live H1N1 Influenza Virus on the Hands of Human VolunteersClinical Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Inactivation of Avian Influenza Virus Using Common Detergents and ChemicalsAvian Diseases, 2008
- Effects of Several Virucidal Agents on Inactivation of Influenza, Newcastle Disease, and Avian Infectious Bronchitis Viruses in the Allantoic Fluid of Chicken EggsJapanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Chlorine Inactivation of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus (H5N1)Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Low pH gel intranasal sprays inactivate influenza viruses in vitro and protect ferrets against influenza infectionRespiratory Research, 2007
- Inactivation of Avian Influenza Viruses by Chemical Agents and Physical Conditions: A ReviewZoonoses and Public Health, 2007
- The Effect of Various Disinfectants on Detection of Avian Influenza Virus by Real Time RT-PCRAvian Diseases, 2003
- Survival of Avian Influenza Virus H7N2 in SPF Chickens and Their EnvironmentsAvian Diseases, 2003
- Interaction of the Influenza Virus Nucleoprotein with the Cellular CRM1-Mediated Nuclear Export PathwayJournal of Virology, 2001
- Hemolytic activity of influenza virus hemagglutinin glycoproteins activated in mildly acidic environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1983