How Many Raters Should be Used for Establishing Cutoff Scores with the Angoff Method? a Generalizability Theory Study
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 59 (6) , 885-897
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921970233
Abstract
Although the Angoff method is perhaps the most highly regarded and widely used judgmental method for setting criterion-referenced cutoff scores, little research has been conducted to determine the optimal number of raters to employ for obtaining stable cutoff scores. In the present study, Angoff ratings obtained from eight different occupational licensing examinations were evaluated via generalizability theory to estimate the optimal number of raters. Results indicated that approximately 10 to 15 raters is an optimal target range, although fewer raters may sometimes be sufficient. It is recommended that 10 to 15 raters be sampled as a general rule, followed by analyses to determine the optimal number of raters for examinations in a particular profession using a particular procedural variant of the Angoff method.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Generalizability Analyses of Work Keys Listening and Writing TestsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
- Validating the Performance Standards Associated With Passing ScoresReview of Educational Research, 1994
- METHODS OF IMPROVING EMPLOYMENT TEST CRITICAL SCORES DERIVED BY JUDGING TEST CONTENT: A REVIEW AND CRITIQUEPersonnel Psychology, 1992
- The Angoff Cutoff Score Method: The Impact of Frame-of-Reference Rater TrainingEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1991
- METHODOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOMETRIC ISSUES IN SETTING CUTOFF SCORES USING THE ANGOFF METHODPersonnel Psychology, 1991
- Influence of Type of Judge, Normative Information, and Discussion on Standards Recommended for the National Teacher ExaminationsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1990
- SETTING CUTOFF SCORES: LEGAL, PSYCHOMETRIC, AND PROFESSIONAL ISSUES AND GUIDELINESPersonnel Psychology, 1988
- A Consumer’s Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-Referenced TestsReview of Educational Research, 1986
- A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING MINIMUM STANDARDS ON THE NATIONAL TEACHER EXAMINATIONSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1984
- A Comparison of the Nedelsky and Angoff Cutting Score Procedures Using Generalizability TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980