Order Preferencing and Market Quality on U.S. Equity Exchanges
- 1 April 2003
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 16 (2) , 385-415
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg009
Abstract
We present a detailed view of market quality in the presence of preferencing arrangements. A unique dataset provides the opportunity to measure trading costs of marketable orders and fill rates and ex post costs of limit orders across trading venues. For market orders, we find the primary exchange provides the lowest execution costs. However, the preferencing exchanges are no worse than, and in most cases better than, the nonpreferencing regional exchanges. For limit orders, the regionals execute limit orders more frequently than the primary market and with an ex post execution cost that is not very different from the primary market.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Price, trade size, and information in securities marketsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Does the Limit Order Routing Decision Matter?The Review of Financial Studies, 2002
- Short Selling on the New York Stock Exchange and the Effects of the Uptick RuleJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1999
- Order Flow Distribution, Bid–Ask Spreads, and Liquidity Costs: Merrill Lynch's Decision to Cease Routinely Routing Orders to Regional Stock ExchangesJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1998
- A cross-exchange comparison of execution costs and information flow for NYSE-listed stocksJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- Do Competing Specialists and Preferencing Dealers Affect Market Quality?The Review of Financial Studies, 1997
- Third Market Broker‐Dealers: Cost Competitors or Cream Skimmers?The Journal of Finance, 1997
- Cream-Skimming or Profit-Sharing? The Curious Role of Purchased Order FlowThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price VariabilityThe Review of Financial Studies, 1988
- Information Effects on the Bid-Ask SpreadThe Journal of Finance, 1983