No difference in body weight decrease between a low-glycemic-index and a high-glycemic-index diet but reduced LDL cholesterol after 10-wk ad libitum intake of the low-glycemic-index diet
Open Access
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 80 (2) , 337-347
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/80.2.337
Abstract
Background: The role of glycemic index (GI) in appetite and body-weight regulation is still not clear. Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the long-term effects of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet with either low glycemic index (LGI) or high glycemic index (HGI) on ad libitum energy intake, body weight, and composition, as well as on risk factors for type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease in overweight healthy subjects. Design: The study was a 10-wk parallel, randomized, intervention trial with 2 matched groups. The LGI or HGI test foods, given as replacements for the subjects' usual carbohydrate-rich foods, were equal in total energy, energy density, dietary fiber, and macronutrient composition. Subjects were 45 (LGI diet: n = 23; HGI diet: n = 22) healthy overweight [body mass index (in kg/m2): 27.6 ± 0.2] women aged 20–40 y. Results: Energy intake, mean (± SEM) body weight (LGI diet: −1.9 ± 0.5 kg; HGI diet: −1.3 ± 0.3 kg), and fat mass (LGI diet: −1.0 ± 0.4 kg; HGI diet: −0.4 ± 0.3 kg) decreased over time, but the differences between groups were not significant. No significant differences were observed between groups in fasting serum insulin, homeostasis model assessment for relative insulin resistance, homeostasis model assessment for β cell function, triacylglycerol, nonesterified fatty acids, or HDL cholesterol. However, a 10% decrease in LDL cholesterol (P < 0.05) and a tendency to a larger decrease in total cholesterol (P = 0.06) were observed with consumption of the LGI diet as compared with the HGI diet. Conclusions: This study does not support the contention that low-fat LGI diets are more beneficial than HGI diets with regard to appetite or body-weight regulation as evaluated over 10 wk. However, it confirms previous findings of a beneficial effect of LGI diets on risk factors for ischemic heart disease.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-glycemic Index Foods, Hunger, and Obesity: Is There a Connection?Nutrition Reviews, 2009
- Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucoseBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2003
- Glycemic index in chronic disease: a reviewEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2002
- Low-fat diets and energy balance: how does the evidence stand in 2002?Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2002
- High-carbohydrate–low-glycaemic index dietary advice improves glucose disposition index in subjects with impaired glucose toleranceBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2002
- Measurement of rapidly available glucose (RAG) in plant foods: a potentialin vitropredictor of the glycaemic responseBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1996
- Determination of dietary fibre as non-starch polysaccharides with gas–liquid chromatographic, high-performance liquid chromatographic or spectrophotometric measurement of constituent sugarsThe Analyst, 1994
- Beneficial Effect of Low-Glycemic Index Diet in Overweight NIDDM SubjectsDiabetes Care, 1992
- Validation of body composition by dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA)Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 1991
- A Rapid Method for the Analysis of StarchStarch ‐ Stärke, 1986