Effects of the Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration on Medicare Patient Mortality and Cost
- 15 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Services Research
- Vol. 44 (3) , 821-842
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00956.x
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of the Premier Inc. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration (PHQID), a public quality reporting and pay-for-performance (P4P) program, on Medicare patient mortality, cost, and outlier classification. The 2000-2006 Medicare inpatient claims, Medicare denominator files, and Medicare Provider of Service files. Panel data econometric methods are applied to a retrospective cohort of 11,232,452 admissions from 6,713,928 patients with principal diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, pneumonia, or a coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedure from 3,570 acute care hospitals between 2000 and 2006. Three estimators are used to evaluate the effects of the PHQID on risk-adjusted (RA) mortality, cost, and outlier classification in the presence of unobserved selection, resulting from the PHQID being voluntary: fixed effects (FE), FE estimated in the subset of hospitals eligible for the PHQID, and difference-in-difference-in-differences. Data were obtained from CMS. Principal Findings. This analysis found no evidence that the PHQID had a significant effect on RA 30-day mortality or RA 60-day cost for AMI, heart failure, pneumonia, or CABG and weak evidence that the PHQID increased RA outlier classification for heart failure and pneumonia. By not reducing mortality or cost growth, this study suggests that the PHQID has made little impact on the value of inpatient care purchased by Medicare.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Costly is Hospital Quality? A Revealed‐Preference ApproachJournal of Industrial Economics, 2011
- ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency MedicinePublished by Elsevier ,2007
- The Inverse Relationship Between Mortality Rates And Performance In The Hospital Quality Alliance MeasuresHealth Affairs, 2007
- Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality ImprovementNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Pay for Performance in Commercial HMOsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Does Pay-for-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care?Annals of Internal Medicine, 2006
- What Is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care?Medical Care Research and Review, 2006
- What’s the Return? Assessing the Effect of “Pay-for-Performance” Initiatives on the Quality of Care DeliveryMedical Care Research and Review, 2006
- Economic incentives and physicians’ delivery of preventive care: A systematic reviewAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005
- Trends in Medicare Payments in the Last Year of LifeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993