Strategic ambiguity and the ethic of significant choice in the tobacco industry's crisis communication
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Studies
- Vol. 48 (3) , 215-233
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368502
Abstract
The complexity of organizational crises allows for multiple interpretations of evidence, intentions, and responsibility surrounding the crises. Through the use of strategic ambiguity, organizations typically emphasize an interpretation where the organization is viewed most favorably. We offer the criteria of significant choice as a means for evaluating the ethical implications of strategic ambiguity in organizational crisis communication. These criteria are applied to the tobacco industry as a case study. We conclude that the tobacco industry leaders’ crisis response was ethically questionable because the ambiguity it produced was based on incomplete and biased information. This strategic use of ambiguity diminished the deliberative ability of the tobacco industry's stakeholders.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of counter-attack in apologetic public relations crises: The case of General Motors vs. Dateline NBCPublic Relations Review, 1996
- Seeking organizational unity: Building bridges in response to mysterySouthern Communication Journal, 1996
- Dateline NBC'spersuasive attack on Wal‐MartCommunication Quarterly, 1996
- Dow corning's image repair strategies in the breast implant crisisCommunication Quarterly, 1996
- “Mistakes were made”: Organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacyCommunication Studies, 1995
- Deliberative rhetoric as a step in organizational crisis management: Exxon as a case studyCommunication Reports, 1995
- Legitimation endeavors: Impression management strategies used by an organization in crisisCommunication Monographs, 1994
- Reconsidering Openness in Organizational CommunicationAcademy of Management Review, 1987
- Managing issues and influencing public policyPublic Relations Review, 1985
- Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communicationCommunication Monographs, 1984