How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medical Journals Sweden AB in Acta Orthopaedica
- Vol. 78 (5) , 598-609
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710014284
Abstract
(2007). How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice. Acta Orthopaedica: Vol. 78, No. 5, pp. 598-609.This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsBMJ, 2001
- Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibiaThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2001
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Validation of an index of the quality of review articlesPublished by Elsevier ,1991
- Can meta-analyses be trusted?The Lancet, 1991
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings.Psychological Bulletin, 1980