Does Matching in Equating Work: A Discussion
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Measurement in Education
- Vol. 3 (1) , 97-104
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0301_7
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simulation Results of Effects on Linear and Curvilinear Observed-and True-Score Equating Procedures of Matching on a Fallible CriterionApplied Measurement in Education, 1990
- Effect on Equating Results of Matching Samples on an Anchor TestApplied Measurement in Education, 1990
- Equating Methods and Sampling DesignsApplied Measurement in Education, 1990
- What Combination of Sampling and Equating Methods Works Best?Applied Measurement in Education, 1990
- Problems Related to the Use of Conventional and Item Response Theory Equating Methods in Less Than Optimal CircumstancesApplied Psychological Measurement, 1987
- Some Practical Issues in EquatingApplied Psychological Measurement, 1987
- Linear Equating Models for the Common-item Nonequivalent-Populations DesignApplied Psychological Measurement, 1987
- AN EXAMINATION OF THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE EQUATING OF PARALLEL FORMS IS POPULATION‐INDEPENDENTJournal of Educational Measurement, 1986
- Effect of Examinee Group on Equating RelationshipsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1986
- LATENT TRAIT MODELS AND THEIR USE IN THE ANALYSIS OF EDUCATIONAL TEST DATA1,2,3Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977