Broken Promise: The Supreme Court's Response to Social Science Research on Capital Punishment
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Social Issues
- Vol. 50 (2) , 75-101
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02411.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- "Modern" death qualification: New data on its biasing effects.Law and Human Behavior, 1994
- Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions.Law and Human Behavior, 1994
- Psychology and legal change: The impact of a decade.Law and Human Behavior, 1993
- The Fourteenth Amendment and symbolic legality: Let them eat due process.Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- To tell what we know or wait for Godot?Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- Death qualification after Wainwright v. Witt and Lockhart v. McCree..Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- McCleskey v. Kemp: Race, Capital Punishment, and the Supreme CourtHarvard Law Review, 1988
- On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of the death-qualification process.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Determining the neutrality of death-qualified juries: Judicial appraisal of empirical data.Law and Human Behavior, 1984