A Once-Daily Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Regimen Is Noninferior to Twice-Daily Dosing and Results in Similar Safety and Tolerability in Antiretroviral-Naive Subjects Through 48 Weeks
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
- Vol. 50 (5) , 474-481
- https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0b013e31819c2937
Abstract
Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-dosed twice daily has demonstrated durable efficacy in antiretroviral-naive and protease inhibitor (PI) -experienced patients. Study M05-730 compared LPV/r tablets dosed once daily vs. twice daily in antiretroviral-naive subjects. Six hundred sixty-four subjects were randomized to LPV/r soft gel capsules (SGCs) once daily, SGC twice daily, tablets once daily, and tablets twice daily, all with tenofovir and emtricitabine once daily. At week 8, all SGC-treated subjects were switched to tablets, maintaining randomized dose frequency. The primary efficacy analysis used an intent-to-treat, noncompleter = failure approach to assess noninferiority of the LPV/r once-daily group compared with the twice-daily group. At week 48, 77% of once-daily-dosed subjects vs. 76% of twice-daily-dosed subjects had HIV-1 RNA or = 100,000 copies per milliliter (75% once daily vs. 74.6% twice daily; P > 0.999) or when analyzed by baseline CD4+ T-cell count ( or = 200 cells/mm3). Rates of discontinuation and adverse events, including diarrhea, were similar between arms. Among subjects with protocol-defined virologic rebound through week 48, no new PI resistance mutations were detected. At 48 weeks, the antiviral response in the LPV/r once-daily group was noninferior to the twice-daily group when coadministered with tenofovir and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive subjects. Efficacy was comparable between the once-daily and twice-daily groups regardless of baseline HIV-1 RNA or CD4+ T-cell count. Safety and tolerability of once-daily and twice-daily dosing was also comparable. No new PI resistance mutations were detected upon virologic rebound.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Significant improvements in self-reported gastrointestinal tolerability, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and adherence with lopinavir/ritonavir tablet formulation compared with soft gel capsulesAIDS Research and Therapy, 2008
- Seven-Year Efficacy of a Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Regimen in Antiretroviral—Naïve HIV-1-Infected PatientsHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2008
- A Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Once-Daily Regimen Results in Better Compliance and Is Non-inferior to a Twice-Daily Regimen Through 96 WeeksAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2007
- High-Dose Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Highly Treatment-Experienced HIV-1 Patients: Efficacy, Safety, and Predictors of ResponseHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2007
- The Tablet Formulation of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Provides Similar Bioavailability to the Soft-Gelatin Capsule Formulation With Less Pharmacokinetic Variability and Diminished Food EffectJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2007
- Better maintained adherence on switching from twice‐daily to once‐daily therapy for HIV: a 24‐week randomized trial of treatment simplification using stavudine prolonged‐release capsulesHIV Medicine, 2005
- Long-term safety and durable antiretroviral activity of lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive patientsAIDS, 2004
- Once‐Daily versus Twice‐Daily Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Antiretroviral‐Naive HIV‐Positive Patients: A 48‐Week Randomized Clinical TrialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Risk Stratification of Coronary Heart Disease in Greece: Final Results from the CARDIO2000 Epidemiological StudyPreventive Medicine, 2002
- Lopinavir–Ritonavir versus Nelfinavir for the Initial Treatment of HIV InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002