Invariants in auditory frequency relations
- 1 September 1981
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 22 (1) , 129-144
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1981.tb00388.x
Abstract
A group theoretic description of auditory frequency is shown to have important implications for understanding invariants in sound patterns. Frequency can be mathematically conceived in terms of a logarithmic spiral which involves two generative group parameters. The spiral representation not only underlies the logarithmic relationship between the frequency of a tone and its stated musical pitch but it affords an objective basis for invariants that summarize other well‐known auditory relationships including distinctions which involve different tuning systems. The spiral analysis represents a new and potentially useful tool for describing auditory invariants with important implications for emerging theories of music perception and issues in psychophysical scaling of tonal patterns.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tone chroma is functional in melody recognitionPerception & Psychophysics, 1979
- Categorical perception of tonal intervais: Musicians can’t tellsharp fromflatPerception & Psychophysics, 1977
- On the bases of similarity of musical intervals: a chronometric analysisThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977
- Judged similarity in pitch of octave multiplesPerception & Psychophysics, 1977
- The perception of melodies distorted by splitting into several octaves: Effects of increasing proximity and melodic contourPerception & Psychophysics, 1977
- Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.Psychological Review, 1976
- Circularity in Judgments of Relative PitchThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964
- Group Theory and its Applications to Physical ProblemsAmerican Journal of Physics, 1962
- The Relation of Pitch to Frequency: A Revised ScaleThe American Journal of Psychology, 1940
- Generalization as a function of method of reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1939