Efficient Assessment of the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Structural Validity Analyses of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (Form S)
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
- Vol. 32 (1) , 14-30
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.1999.12068967
Abstract
Results of confirmatory and exploratory analyses of 485 nonstudent adults' responses to the NEO Five-Factor Inventory indicated that a 6-factor model best fit the data.This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparing the NEO-FFI and Saucier's Mini-Markers as measures of the Big FivePersonality and Individual Differences, 1996
- Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indicesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1995
- The NEO five-factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university womenPersonality and Individual Differences, 1994
- Parsimony‐based fit indices for multiple‐indicator models: Do they work?Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1994
- A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteemStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1994
- The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993
- Confirmatory factor analysis of the revised NEO personality inventoryPersonality and Individual Differences, 1993
- DSM-III—R personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: An empirical comparison.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1992
- Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A Revision of the NEO Personality InventoryPersonality and Individual Differences, 1991
- From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988