Posterior circulation flow diversion: a single-center experience and literature review
- 1 July 2014
- journal article
- case report
- Published by BMJ in Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
- Vol. 7 (8) , 574-583
- https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011281
Abstract
Background Flow diverters have been used predominantly for large anterior circulation aneurysms. Data on the safety and efficacy of this treatment for posterior circulation aneurysms are limited. Objective To present our posterior circulation flow diverter experience, outcomes and morbidity in comparison with recent studies. Methods A retrospective chart and imaging review of six patients with seven aneurysms in posterior circulation vessels, treated with flow diverter technology was carried out. A literature review was performed using standard online search tools. Results We included five saccular and two fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms. An average of two flow diverters was placed for each patient. Adjunctive coiling was used in three cases. Follow-up at an average of 14.5 months showed complete angiographic occlusion in 4 (57.1%) cases, including one patient with in-stent thrombosis and major brainstem stroke at 4.5 months, a week after self-discontinuing dual antiplatelet therapy. Two other patients developed small periprocedural strokes but had excellent recovery. One death occurred 18 months after the initial procedure. No aneurysm rupture or parenchymal hemorrhage was seen. Overall, 5 (71%) cases, all with saccular aneurysms, had good clinical outcome (modified Rankin score (mRS) 0–1). Fusiform basilar aneurysms had markedly worse outcomes (mRS 5 and 6). Our literature review yielded six other studies with 100 additional patients. Overall, good outcome was seen in 74.3%, with a 12.3% average mortality and 11% permanent neurologic deficit rate. Complete occlusion varied from 43% to 100%. Conclusions Flow diversion may be a possible treatment in carefully selected patients with high-risk atypical posterior circulation aneurysms, with poor natural history and no optimal treatment strategy. Symptomatic and fusiform large aneurysms appear to carry the highest risk. Further studies are necessary to assess the role of flow diversion in the posterior circulation.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: Results from a Multicenter Clinical TrialRadiology, 2013
- Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms With the Pipeline Embolization DeviceNeurosurgery, 2013
- Safety of the Pipeline Embolization Device in Treatment of Posterior Circulation AneurysmsAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2012
- Panacea or problem: flow diverters in the treatment of symptomatic large or giant fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysmsJournal of Neurosurgery, 2012
- Delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage following pipeline embolization device treatment for a giant recanalized ophthalmic aneurysmJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2011
- Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissectionsNeuroradiology, 2011
- Early Experience in the Treatment of Intra-Cranial Aneurysms by Endovascular Flow Diversion: A Multicentre Prospective StudyPLOS ONE, 2010
- High-Profile Flow Diverter (Silk) Implantation in the Basilar ArteryStroke, 2010
- Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms by Functional Reconstruction of the Parent Artery: The Budapest Experience with the Pipeline Embolization DeviceAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2010
- CURATIVE ENDOVASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION OF CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS WITH THE PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICENeurosurgery, 2009