Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add Value?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 59 (3) , 1083-1124
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00657.x
Abstract
We show that analysts from sell‐side firms generally recommend “glamour” (i.e., positive momentum, high growth, high volume, and relatively expensive) stocks. Naïve adherence to these recommendations can be costly, because the level of the consensus recommendation adds value only among stocks with favorable quantitative characteristics (i.e., value stocks and positive momentum stocks). In fact, among stocks with unfavorable quantitative characteristics, higher consensus recommendations are associated with worse subsequent returns. In contrast, we find that the quarterly change in consensus recommendations is a robust return predictor that appears to contain information orthogonal to a large range of other predictive variables.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confidence and Investors' Reliance on Disciplined Trading StrategiesJournal of Accounting Research, 2003
- Prophets and Losses: Reassessing the Returns to Analysts' Stock RecommendationsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 2001
- How Do Analysts Use Their Earnings Forecasts in Generating Stock Recommendations?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Conflict of Interest and the Credibility of Underwriter Analyst RecommendationsThe Review of Financial Studies, 1999
- Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?The Journal of Finance, 1996
- Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and RiskThe Journal of Finance, 1994
- The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- DISCUSSIONThe Journal of Finance, 1986
- Discrete Expectational Data and Portfolio PerformanceThe Journal of Finance, 1986