Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Physiological Genomics
- Vol. 32 (1) , 82-94
- https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00161.2007
Abstract
The Tas1r3 gene encodes the T1R3 receptor protein, which is involved in sweet taste transduction. To characterize ligand specificity of the T1R3 receptor and the genetic architecture of sweet taste responsiveness, we analyzed taste responses of 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice to a variety of chemically diverse sweeteners and glucose polymers with three different measures: consumption in 48-h two-bottle preference tests, initial licking responses, and responses of the chorda tympani nerve. The results were generally consistent across the three measures. Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 gene influenced taste responsiveness to nonnutritive sweeteners (saccharin, acesulfame-K, sucralose, SC-45647), sugars (sucrose, maltose, glucose, fructose), sugar alcohols (erythritol, sorbitol), and some amino acids (d-tryptophan, d-phenylalanine, l-proline). Tas1r3 genotype did not affect taste responses to several sweet-tasting amino acids (l-glutamine, l-threonine, l-alanine, glycine), glucose polymers (Polycose, maltooligosaccharide), and nonsweet NaCl, HCl, quinine, monosodium glutamate, and inosine 5′-monophosphate. Thus Tas1r3 polymorphisms affect taste responses to many nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners (all of which must interact with a taste receptor involving T1R3), but not to all carbohydrates and amino acids. In addition, we found that the genetic architecture of sweet taste responsiveness changes depending on the measure of taste response and the intensity of the sweet taste stimulus. Variation in the T1R3 receptor influenced peripheral taste responsiveness over a wide range of sweetener concentrations, but behavioral responses to higher concentrations of some sweeteners increasingly depended on mechanisms that could override input from the peripheral taste system.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J micePhysiology & Behavior, 2008
- Sucrose motivation in sweet “sensitive” (C57BL/6J) and “subsensitive” (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio lickingPhysiology & Behavior, 2006
- Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet “sensitive” (C57BL/6J) and “subsensitive” (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharidesPhysiology & Behavior, 2006
- Inbred mouse strain survey of sucrose intakePhysiology & Behavior, 2005
- Contribution of α-Gustducin to Taste-guided Licking Responses of MiceChemical Senses, 2005
- The Receptors for Mammalian Sweet and Umami TastePublished by Elsevier ,2003
- A High-throughput Screening Procedure for Identifying Mice with Aberrant Taste and Oromotor FunctionChemical Senses, 2002
- Why Do We Eat? A Neural Systems ApproachAnnual Review of Nutrition, 1997
- Lack of an order effect in brief contact taste tests with closely spaced test trialsPhysiology & Behavior, 1992
- Genetic influence on water and sweetened water consumption in micePhysiology & Behavior, 1976