A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a randomised trial
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 108 (1) , 23-26
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-5456(00)00007-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trialPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- A randomized clinical trial comparing misoprostol with prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripeningAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervicesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled TrialObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): Randomized comparisonAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- A Comparative Study of Vaginal Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Induction of LabourGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 1995