A Fresh Look at the Risks of Artificial Infant Feeding
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Human Lactation
- Vol. 9 (2) , 97-107
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089033449300900222
Abstract
Declining breastfeeding rates and the aggressive marketing of breastmilk substitutes has blurred the distinction between breastmilk and formula. Claims that infant formula is safe, economical, easy to use, and nutritionally complete are challenged in this article, the intent of which is to raise the awareness of health workers to the non-publicized side of infant formula. Non-proprietary, referenced data is provided to illustrate that formula and breastmilk are not the same thing, and that health outcomes of infants who consume each may be different. Guilt is often cited by health workers as a reason to avoid informing parents about the risks of artificial feeding. Suggestions are offered for addressing this reasoning.Keywords
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- Breathing patterns of preterm infants during bottle feeding: Role of milk flowThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Cow milk protein hydrolysate infant formulas not always “hypoallergenic”The Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Science of bottle feedingThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Safety of casein hydrolysate formula in children with cow milk allergyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Anaphylaxis after ingestion of a recently introduced hydrolyzed whey protein formulaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Anaphylaxis to casein hydrolysate formulaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Errors in formula concentration in an outpatient populationThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1987
- Bone mineralization and growth in term infants fed soy-based or cow milk-based formulaPublished by Elsevier ,1987
- Bioavailability of supplemental iron in commercially prepared dry infant cerealsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1987
- Apnea, bradycardia, and cyanosis during oral feeding in term neonatesThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1985