Speech Perception Using Maps Based on Neural Response Telemetry Measures
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 23 (1) , 72S-79S
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200202001-00009
Abstract
To determine how speech perception is affected for Nucleus cochlear implant users when their speech processor is programmed using neural response telemetry (NRT) measures rather than traditional behavioral estimates of threshold and maximum comfort level. Electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP) thresholds were measured for a group of 10 adult Nucleus cochlear implant users. These physiologic threshold estimates were used to create three SPEAK MAPs. One MAP (“+10/−20 MAP”) was created using only the NRT data. The second MAP (“Combined MAP”) was created using a combination of both EAP thresholds and a single behavioral measure of threshold and maximum comfort level from electrode 10. A third MAP (“Measured MAP”) was created using standard programming techniques. Speech perception was then assessed using each of these three MAPs for either CUNY or HINT sentences presented at two different presentation levels (70 dB SPL and 55 dB SPL). On average, at the higher presentation level (70 dB SPL) subjects performed significantly better when using the Measured MAP than when using either of the NRT-based MAPs. No significant difference in speech perception was obtained for either of the three MAPs when the lower presentation level (55 dB SPL) was used. This study demonstrated that at relatively high presentation levels, speech perception scores obtained by subjects who use MAPs based solely or primarily on EAP thresholds are slightly lower than similar scores obtained using a more traditional MAP. This difference did not reach statistical significance at lower presentation levels. We interpret these findings in a positive light to suggest that although NRT-based MAPs may not be optimal, they are of sufficient quality to support reasonable levels of speech understanding. This is important to establish because these MAPs may prove to be most useful when very young children receive a cochlear implant.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Relationship Between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from AdultsEar & Hearing, 2000
- Comparison of EAP Thresholds with MAP Levels in the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant: Data from ChildrenEar & Hearing, 2000
- Comparison of Two Methods for Selecting Minimum Stimulation Levels Used in Programming the Nucleus 22 Cochlear ImplantJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1999
- Summary of Results Using the Nucleus CI24M Implant to Record the Electrically Evoked Compound Action PotentialEar & Hearing, 1999
- Amplitude Mapping and Phoneme Recognition in Cochlear Implant ListenersEar & Hearing, 1999
- Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implantsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- The Effect of Loudness Imbalance between Electrodes in Cochlear Implant UsersEar & Hearing, 1997
- Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: Data from human cochlear implant usersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990