All Tests for a Fault are Not Eyually Valuable for Defect Detection
- 24 August 2005
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- p. 762-769
- https://doi.org/10.1109/test.1992.527898
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TEST SETS ON QUALITY LEVEL PREDICTION: WHEN IS 80% BETTER THAN 90%?Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2005
- Detecting bridging faults with stuck-at test setsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2003
- Functional approaches to generating orderings for efficient symbolic representationsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2003
- Fast functional evaluation of candidate OBDD variable orderingsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2002
- The influences of fault type and topology on fault model performance and the implications to test and testable designPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2002
- Heuristics to compute variable orderings for efficient manipulation of ordered binary decision diagramsPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1991
- IC quality and test transparencyIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 1989
- Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function ManipulationIEEE Transactions on Computers, 1986
- Defect Level as a Function of Fault CoverageIEEE Transactions on Computers, 1981
- Bridging and Stuck-At FaultsIEEE Transactions on Computers, 1974