The Effects of Perceived Ability and Impartiality of Mediators and Time Pressure on Negotiation
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 24 (2) , 311-327
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002200278002400209
Abstract
This study provided empirical clarification of the effects of factors presumed in the negotiation literature, but not clearly demonstrated, to be central to the negotiation process. One hundred and forty subjects participated in a simulated labor-management negotiation to determine the effects of perceived ability and impartiality of a mediator and time pressure on negotiation. Results showed that negotiators utilizing a mediator perceived to be high in ability gained more money, were influenced to a greater extent, and perceived the mediator as more powerful and favorable than negotiators with a mediator perceived to be low in ability. Also, negotiators bargaining with a high perceived-ability mediator ended with more money, were more influenced, and indicated more satisfaction than controls. Finally, time pressure produced more contract settlements in the high time-pressure situation than in the low time-pressure situation.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of initial bargaining position and alternative modes of third party intervention in resolving bargaining impassesOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976
- Effects of locus of control and style of third party intervention upon bargaining behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976
- Third Party Intervention and the Bargaining Behavior of Group RepresentativesJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1975
- What do you do when the control group doesn't fit into the factorial design?Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- Effects of bargaining strategy and pressure to reach agreement in a stalemated negotiation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- Effects of extremity of offers and concession rate on the outcomes of bargaining.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972
- Style of third party intervention, face-saving and bargaining behaviorJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1972
- Preintervention effects of mediation versus arbitration.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972
- Bargaining and concession making under bilateral monopoly.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968
- The State Mediator: Background, Self-Image, and AttitudesILR Review, 1964