Affirmative Disclosure: Long-term Monitoring of Residual Effects
Open Access
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing & Public Policy
- Vol. 2 (1) , 38-45
- https://doi.org/10.1177/074391568300200104
Abstract
In 1973, the Federal Trade Commission charged the manufacturer of Hawaiian Punch fruit drink with deceptive advertising of the proportion of natural fruit juice in the product. A consent order that specified the use of corrective advertising (affirmative disclosure) to correct suspected residual effects was agreed to. The order required that a consumer survey be conducted to demonstrate whether the residual effects had dissipated to an acceptable level. This study presents the results of 11 cross-sectional surveys taken over a nine-year period following the FTC order. The results indicate that residual effects have systematically declined over the nine-year period and are now at a level which meets one of the FTC's three criteria for termination of the affirmative disclosure advertising message.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corrective Advertising: Evolution of the Legal Theory and Application of the RemedyJournal of Advertising, 1982
- Affirmative Disclosure: Perspectives on FTC OrdersJournal of Marketing & Public Policy, 1982
- Affirmative Disclosure: Perspectives on FTC OrdersJournal of Marketing & Public Policy, 1982
- A Longitudinal Study of Corrective AdvertisingJournal of Marketing Research, 1978
- An Experimental Evaluation of a Proposed Corrective Advertising RemedyJournal of Marketing Research, 1976