Comparison of Three Methods of Measuring Corneal Thickness and Anterior Chamber Depth
- 31 January 2006
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 141 (1) , 7-12.e1
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.048
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Central corneal thickness measurements with partial coherence interferometry, ultrasound, and the Orbscan systemOphthalmology, 2004
- Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, non-contact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusisBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2004
- Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thicknessBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2004
- Corneal thickness measurements: Scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2003
- Comparison of ultrasound pachymetry and partial coherence interferometry in the measurement of central corneal thicknessJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2002
- Anterior chamber depth measurement: A-scan versus optical methodsJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2002
- Anterior chamber depth estimation by Scheimpflug photographyActa Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 2001
- The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster™*Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2001
- The Repeatability of Corneal Thickness MeasuresCornea, 2000
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986