Phase II enzyme inducer, sulforaphane, inhibits UVB‐induced AP‐1 activation in human keratinocytes by a novel mechanism
- 13 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Carcinogenesis
- Vol. 41 (3) , 179-186
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.20052
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) light‐induced activation of activator protein‐1 (AP‐1), resulting at least in part from oxidative stress, promotes skin carcinogenesis. It has not yet been determined whether elevating cellular phase II enzymes and glutathione (GSH) levels inhibits the AP‐1 activation. We have, therefore, examined the effects of two well‐known inducers of phase II enzymes, sulforaphane (SF) and tert‐butylhydroquinone (tBHQ), on UVB‐induced AP‐1 activation, with an AP‐1‐luciferase reporter plasmid that was stably transfected into human HaCaT keratinocytes (HCL14 cells). Exposure of HCL14 cells to SF or tBHQ led to the induction of quinone reductase‐1 (QR‐1), a marker of global cellular phase II enzymes, as well as elevation of cellular GSH levels. Incubation of the cells with 1–10 μM SF or 11–45 μM tBHQ for 24 h resulted in up to 1.4‐fold and 1.7‐fold increase of QR‐1 activity, respectively, and up to 1.5‐fold and 1.6‐fold increases in cellular GSH levels, respectively. AP‐1 activation was dramatically enhanced by irradiating HCL14 cells with 250 J/m2 of UVB. While the above SF treatment dose‐dependently reduced the UVB‐induced AP‐1 activation in HCL14 cells, the tBHQ treatment did not, suggesting that elevating cellular phase II enzymes and GSH levels may not lead to inhibition of UVB‐induced AP‐1 activation. Indeed, depleting cellular GSH by 80% did not affect UVB‐induced AP‐1 activation either. Subsequent electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) showed that SF added directly to the EMSAs inhibited AP‐1 DNA binding activity, whereas tBHQ was ineffective. Taken together, our results indicated that elevating phase II enzymes and GSH levels in human keratinocytes does not lead to significant inhibition of UVB‐induced AP‐1 activation. The inhibitory effect of SF on UVB‐induced AP‐1 activation appears to be at least partly due to the direct inhibition of AP‐1 DNA binding activity. This direct effect of SF on AP‐1 DNA binding is a novel mechanism for the action of a drug inhibitor of AP‐1 activation.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modulation of c-jun and c-fos Transcription by UVB and UVA Radiations in Human Dermal Fibroblasts and KB CellsPhotochemistry and Photobiology, 2007
- RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF NF-κB AND AP-1 IN THE MODULATION BY CURCUMIN AND PYRROLIDINE DITHIOCARBAMATE OF THE UVB-INDUCED CYTOKINE EXPRESSION BY KERATINOCYTESCytokine, 2002
- AP-1 as a regulator of cell life and deathNature Cell Biology, 2002
- Nordihydroguaiaretic acid–mediated inhibition of ultraviolet B–induced activator protein‐1 activation in human keratinocytesMolecular Carcinogenesis, 2002
- Cancer Statistics, 2002CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2002
- Modulation of c-jun and c-fos Transcription by UVB and UVA Radiations in Human Dermal Fibroblasts and KB CellsPhotochemistry and Photobiology, 2000
- Vanadate-induced activation of activator protein-1: role of reactive oxygen speciesCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1999
- c‐jun and multistage carcinogenesis: Association of overexpression of introduced c‐jun with progression toward a neoplastic endpoint in mouse JB6 cells sensitive to tumor promoter‐induced transformationMolecular Carcinogenesis, 1995
- MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION CARCINOGENESISPhotochemistry and Photobiology, 1990
- Redox Regulation of Fos and Jun DNA-Binding Activity in VitroScience, 1990