A Parametric ROC Model‐Based Approach for Evaluating the Predictiveness of Continuous Markers in Case–Control Studies
- 23 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Biometrics
- Vol. 65 (4) , 1133-1144
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01201.x
Abstract
Summary The predictiveness curve shows the population distribution of risk endowed by a marker or risk prediction model. It provides a means for assessing the model's capacity for stratifying the population according to risk. Methods for making inference about the predictiveness curve have been developed using cross‐sectional or cohort data. Here we consider inference based on case–control studies, which are far more common in practice. We investigate the relationship between the ROC curve and the predictiveness curve. Insights about their relationship provide alternative ROC interpretations for the predictiveness curve and for a previously proposed summary index of it. Next the relationship motivates ROC based methods for estimating the predictiveness curve. An important advantage of these methods over previously proposed methods is that they are rank invariant. In addition they provide a way of combining information across populations that have similar ROC curves but varying prevalence of the outcome. We apply the methods to prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), a marker for predicting risk of prostate cancer.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Borrowing Information Across Populations in Estimating Positive and Negative Predictive ValuesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 2011
- Semiparametric Methods for Evaluating the Covariate-Specific Predictiveness of Continuous Markers in Matched Case–Control StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 2010
- Semiparametric methods for evaluating risk prediction markers in case-control studiesBiometrika, 2009
- Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curveBiometrika, 2009
- Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study DesignJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Biomarker evaluation and comparison using the controls as a reference populationBiostatistics, 2008
- Integrating the Predictiveness of a Marker with Its Performance as a ClassifierAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Evaluating the Predictiveness of a Continuous MarkerBiometrics, 2007
- “Proper” Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood EstimationJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1999
- Business Failures: Another Example of the Analysis of Failure DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1954