A Large Proportion of P. falciparum Isolates in the Amazon Region of Peru Lack pfhrp2 and pfhrp3: Implications for Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 25 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 5 (1) , e8091
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008091
Abstract
Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) offer significant potential to improve the diagnosis of malaria, and are playing an increasing role in malaria case management, control and elimination. Peru, along with other South American countries, is moving to introduce malaria RDTs as components of malaria control programmes supported by the Global Fund for AIDS, TB and malaria. The selection of the most suitable malaria RDTs is critical to the success of the programmes. Eight of nine microscopy positive P. falciparum samples collected in Iquitos, Peru tested negative or weak positive using HRP2-detecting RDTs. These samples were tested for the presence of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 and their flanking genes by PCR, as well as the presence of HRP proteins by ELISA. To investigate for geographic extent of HRP-deleted parasites and their temporal occurrence a retrospective study was undertaken on 148 microscopy positive P. falciparum samples collected in different areas of the Amazon region of Peru. Eight of the nine isolates lacked the pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 genes and one or both flanking genes, and the absence of HRP was confirmed by ELISA. The retrospective study showed that 61 (41%) and 103 (70%) of the 148 samples lacked the pfhrp2 or pfhrp3 genes respectively, with 32 (21.6%) samples lacking both hrp genes. This is the first documentation of P. falciparum field isolates lacking pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3. The high frequency and wide distribution of different parasites lacking pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 in widely dispersed areas in the Peruvian Amazon implies that malaria RDTs targeting HRP2 will fail to detect a high proportion of P. falciparum in malaria-endemic areas of Peru and should not be used. RDTs detecting parasite LDH or aldolase and quality microscopy should be use for malaria diagnosis in this region. There is an urgent need for investigation of the abundance and geographic distribution of these parasites in Peru and neighbouring countries.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Working without a blindfold: the critical role of diagnostics in malaria controlMalaria Journal, 2008
- Detection of genome-wide polymorphisms in the AT-rich Plasmodium falciparum genome using a high-density microarrayBMC Genomics, 2008
- Improving community health worker use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Zambia: package instructions, job aid and job aid-plus-trainingMalaria Journal, 2008
- Ensuring quality and access for malaria diagnosis: how can it be achieved?Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2006
- Effect of Sequence Variation in Plasmodium falciparum Histidine- Rich Protein 2 on Binding of Specific Monoclonal Antibodies: Implications for Rapid Diagnostic Tests for MalariaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Genetic Diversity ofPlasmodium falciparumHistidine‐Rich Protein 2 (PfHRP2) and Its Effect on the Performance of PfHRP2‐Based Rapid Diagnostic TestsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Devices for Rapid Diagnosis of Malaria: Evaluation of Prototype Assays That Detect Plasmodium falciparum Histidine-Rich Protein 2 and a Plasmodium vivax -Specific AntigenJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Comparison of Two Commercial Assays with Expert Microscopy for Confirmation of Symptomatically Diagnosed MalariaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Devices: Performance Characteristics of the Para Sight F Device Determined in a Multisite Field StudyJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Limited Level of Accuracy Provided by Available Rapid Diagnosis Tests for Malaria Enhances the Need for PCR-Based Reference LaboratoriesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001