The AB/BA crossover: past, present and future?
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Statistical Methods in Medical Research
- Vol. 3 (4) , 303-324
- https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029400300402
Abstract
The AB/BA design is reviewed from a historical perspective. Particular attention is paid to the problem of carry-over and various attempts to deal with it. The two-stage procedure, an approach which was popular for many years, is shown to be unsafe. The analysis of AB/BA designs with baseline data is also considered. It is shown that such baselines do not provide a cure for the problem of carry-over; and it is concluded that any rational analysis of such trials will always be dependent on assumptions regarding carry-over, and that it is necessary to pay particular attention to washout periods. Under such circumstances analysis of covariance may be useful. In conclusion, some speculative comments about future lines of research are offered.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of Cross‐Over Trials When Within‐Subject Errors Follow an AR(1) ProcessBiometrical Journal, 1992
- Is the ‘simple carry‐over’ model useful?Statistics in Medicine, 1992
- Analysis of the crossover design in the presence of residual effectsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- The analysis of data from 2 × 2 cross‐over trials with baseline measurementsStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- A Note on the Analysis of the Two‐Period Crossover Design When the Period‐Treatment Interaction is SignificantBiometrical Journal, 1987
- Current Thoughts on Crossover DesignsClinical Research Practices and Drug Regulatory Affairs, 1986
- The Two-Period Crossover TrialJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1982
- t Is for Trouble (and Textbooks): A Critique of Some Examples of the Paired-Samples t-TestJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1982
- Model building and testing for the change‐over designBiometrical Journal, 1980
- THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEANBiometrika, 1908