Subjective Verification of Numerical Models as a Component of a Broader Interaction between Research and Operations
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Weather and Forecasting
- Vol. 18 (5) , 847-860
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0847:svonma>2.0.co;2
Abstract
Systematic subjective verification of precipitation forecasts from two numerical models is presented and discussed. The subjective verification effort was carried out as part of the 2001 Spring Program, a seven-week collaborative experiment conducted at the NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) and the NWS/Storm Prediction Center, with participation from the NCEP/Environmental Modeling Center, the NOAA/Forecast Systems Laboratory, the Norman, Oklahoma, National Weather Service Forecast Office, and Iowa State University. This paper focuses on a comparison of the operational Eta Model and an experimental version of this model run at NSSL; results are limited to precipitation forecasts, although other models and model output fields were verified and evaluated during the program. By comparing forecaster confidence in model solutions to next-day assessments of model performance, this study yields unique information about the utility of models for human forecasters. It is shown that, when avera... Abstract Systematic subjective verification of precipitation forecasts from two numerical models is presented and discussed. The subjective verification effort was carried out as part of the 2001 Spring Program, a seven-week collaborative experiment conducted at the NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) and the NWS/Storm Prediction Center, with participation from the NCEP/Environmental Modeling Center, the NOAA/Forecast Systems Laboratory, the Norman, Oklahoma, National Weather Service Forecast Office, and Iowa State University. This paper focuses on a comparison of the operational Eta Model and an experimental version of this model run at NSSL; results are limited to precipitation forecasts, although other models and model output fields were verified and evaluated during the program. By comparing forecaster confidence in model solutions to next-day assessments of model performance, this study yields unique information about the utility of models for human forecasters. It is shown that, when avera...Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Verification of Recent Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts in the National Weather Service: A Simple Approach for Scoring Forecast AccuracyWeather and Forecasting, 2003
- Properties of the Convection Scheme in NCEP's Eta Model that Affect Forecast Sounding InterpretationWeather and Forecasting, 2002
- Comparison between Observed Convective Cloud-Base Heights and Lifting Condensation Level for Two Different Lifted ParcelsWeather and Forecasting, 2002
- Examination of Derecho Environments Using Proximity SoundingsWeather and Forecasting, 2001
- The Melting Effect as a Factor in Precipitation-Type ForecastingWeather and Forecasting, 2000
- Hypothesis Tests for Evaluating Numerical Precipitation ForecastsWeather and Forecasting, 1999
- The New NMC Mesoscale Eta Model: Description and Forecast ExamplesWeather and Forecasting, 1994
- The Step-Mountain Eta Coordinate Model: Further Developments of the Convection, Viscous Sublayer, and Turbulence Closure SchemesMonthly Weather Review, 1994
- Severe Local Storms ForecastingWeather and Forecasting, 1992
- Forecasting and Verifying in a Field Research Project: DOPLIGHT '87Weather and Forecasting, 1989