Yes, we still need Universal Grammar
- 30 November 2004
- Vol. 94 (1) , 85-93
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Universal aspects of word learningPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2005
- But do we need universal grammar? Comment onCognition, 2004
- Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammarCognition, 2003
- One Frog, Two Frog, Red Frog, Blue Frog: Factors Affecting Children's Syntactic Choices in Production and ComprehensionJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2000
- Twistin' the Night AwayLanguage, 1997
- Structural Limits on Verb Mapping: The Role of Analogy in Children's Interpretations of SentencesCognitive Psychology, 1996
- When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growthLingua, 1994
- Infants' Contribution to the Achievement of Joint ReferenceChild Development, 1991
- On the semantic content of subcategorization framesCognitive Psychology, 1991
- The Structural Sources of Verb MeaningsLanguage Acquisition, 1990