Fluoranthene-DNA adducts: identification and quantification by an HPLC-32P-postlabeling method
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Carcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research
- Vol. 10 (9) , 1567-1577
- https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/10.9.1567
Abstract
A 32P-postlabeling procedure for identifying and quantifying fhioranthene (FA) - DNA adducts has been developed through modifications of the method of Randerath and collaborators. In this modified procedure, labeled adducts are separated chromatographically by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and quantified by liquid scintillation counting. FA-modified DNA is digested to nucleotide 3′-monophosphates and nucleotide 3′-monophosphate adducts; unmodified nucleotides are then separated from adducts using a disposable C18 cartridge. Residual unmodified nucleotides, which reduce the efficiency of 32P-postlabeling of FA adducts, are removed by brief digestion with nuclease P1. This treatment selectively dephospborylates unmodified nucleotide 3-monophosphates, while FA adducts are minimally affected. FA adducts are then 5-phosphorylated with polynucleotide kinase and [γ-32ATP. Prolonged treatment with nuclease P1 then is employed to remove the unlabeled 3-phosphate from adducted diphosphate nucleotides, following which adducts are separated by HPLC and quantified by liquid scintillation counting. Postlabeled microsomally-activated FA-modified DNA contained adducts derived from anti- and syn-2,3-dihydroxy-l,10b-epoxy-l,2,3-trihydrofluoranthene. The identity of the major adduct of DNA-bound microsomally-activated FA was confirmed by this HPLC-P-postlabeling method as an a/tft-2,3-dihydroxy-l,10b-epoxy-fluoranthene nucleotide adduct. Each step in the procedure was optimized with respect to experimental conditions, and the recovery of adducts was determined by analysis of DNA modified with [3H]FA. In repeated analyses of 2–50 μg DNA containing 1.8 adducts per 10s nucleotides, 10–15% of total DNA-bound [3H]FA was recovered as the major adduct; recovery was greater from DNA containing higher levels of adducts. The reproducibility of multiple analyses of the same sample was ˜5%, and multiple analyses at different times were reproducible within experimental error. The limit of detection of the method was ˜0.1 finol adduct, representing a binding level of ˜ 3 adducts per 108 nucleotides in 1 μg DNA or ˜1 adduct per 1010 nucleotides in 500 μg DNA. Because the method is not limited with respect to the amount of DNA that can be subjected to analysis, the inherent sensitivity for adduct detection can be greatly enhanced by analysis of larger quantities of DNA.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tumorigenicity of fluoranthene in a newborn mouse lung adenoma bioassayCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1984
- 32P-Postlabeling test for covalent DNA binding of chemicals in vivo: application to a variety of aromatic carcinogens and methylating agentsCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1984
- Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in grilled foodJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1983
- Presence of benzo[a]pyrene and other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in suntan oilsFood and Chemical Toxicology, 1982
- Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in smoked fishZeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung, 1982
- 32P-postlabeling analysis of non-radioactive aromatic carcinogen — DNA adductsCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1982
- 32P-labeling test for DNA damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1981
- MUTAGENICITY OF SOOT AND ASSOCIATED POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS TO SALMONELLA-TYPHIMURIUM1979
- Characterization of a Nuclease Produced by Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1967
- Purification and Properties of Spleen PhosphodiesteraseJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1960