Percentage of Unknown Vocabulary Words in Text as a Function of the Relative Difficulty of the text: Implications for Instruction
Open Access
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Reading Behavior
- Vol. 26 (4) , 413-437
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969409547861
Abstract
The relationship between the relative difficulty of passages and the number of unknown words in passages was investigated. In Study I, 219 students in Grades 3, 4, 5, and 6 were given 100-word passages sampled from textbooks and library books (trade books) and then asked to underline each word that they did not know. In Study II, 60 graduate students were given a similar task involving 120 passages at the following levels of difficulty: junior high, senior high, college, and graduate school. Relative difficulty (or relative easiness) was determined from the difference between a measure of the reading ability of the student in grade equivalent (GE) units and a measure of the difficulty level of the material in GE units. The results from both Study I and Study II can be summarized as follows: (a) when the material is relatively easy then close to 0% will be unknown basic words, (b) when the material is relatively hard, then 2% or more will be unknown basic words, and (c) when the difficulty of the material is matched closely to the ability of the reader, then around 1% will be unknown basic words. These findings do not support the theory that free reading results in large vocabulary growth because free reading is likely to involve relatively easy material that contains few, if any, unknown words. Indeed, these findings call into question the practice of devoting large amounts of classroom time to free reading if the purpose is to increase vocabulary or reading level.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Reading Library Books at Different Levels of Difficulty upon Gain in Reading AbilityReading Research Quarterly, 1995
- What Do Standardized Tests of Reading Comprehension Measure in Terms of Efficiency, Accuracy, and Rate?Reading Research Quarterly, 1992
- Toward a Meaningful Definition of Vocabulary SizeJournal of Reading Behavior, 1991
- Predicting accuracy of comprehension from the relative difficulty of the materialLearning and Individual Differences, 1990
- We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input HypothesisThe Modern Language Journal, 1989
- Measuring Readability using DRP UnitsJournal of Reading Behavior, 1985
- Improving the Comprehensibility of Stories: The Effects of Revisions That Improve CoherenceReading Research Quarterly, 1984
- Effects of Three Types of Vocabulary on Readability of Intermediate Grade Science Textbooks: An Application of Finn's Transfer Feature TheoryReading Research Quarterly, 1983
- On the Failure of Readability Formulas to Define Readable Texts: A Case Study from AdaptationsReading Research Quarterly, 1982
- Measuring Prose Difficulty Using the Rauding ScaleReading Research Quarterly, 1975