Accuracy of the New ICare Rebound Tonometer vs. Other Portable Tonometers in Healthy Eyes
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Optometry and Vision Science
- Vol. 83 (2) , 102-107
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000200673.96758.7b
Abstract
PURPOSE: The ICare (Tiolat Oy, Helsinki, Finland) is a new portable tonometer that measures intraocular pressure (IOP) with a new rebound method, in which a very light probe is used to make momentary contact with the cornea in slow motion. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of the ICare IOP measurements by comparing them against other portable tonometers: Perkins applanation tonometer and Tono-Pen XL digital tonometer (Medtronic Solan, Jacksonville, FL). METHODS: Sixty-five young subjects were assessed with each of the tonometers. ICare tonometry was performed first, followed by Perkins applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen XL in a random order. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the Perkins tonometer and the remaining tonometers used in this study. Tonometers were also compared by plotting the difference between the methods against the mean. The hypothesis of zero bias was examined by a paired t test and the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. RESULTS: ICare and Tono-Pen XL significantly overestimate IOP when compared with Perkins applanation tonometry. The mean of the difference between Perkins and ICare and Perkins and Tono-Pen XL was (mean +/- standard deviation) -3.35 +/- 2.28 mm Hg and -2.78 +/- 2.53 mm Hg, respectively. The 95% LoA between Perkins tonometry and ICare tonometry were between -7.81 and +1.12 and between Perkins tonometry and Tono-Pen XL tonometry between -7.74 and +2.18. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with Perkins tonometry, the ICare tonometer allows clinicians to estimate IOP with a portable, rapid, and noninvasive method with similar reliability to that offered by Tono-Pen XL. Clinicians should be aware of the systematic overestimation of IOP with the ICare. Further research is needed to evaluate the performance of rebound tonometry in populations with higher IOP and assess the reliability of this technique in the early detection and follow up of glaucomatous patientsKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Evaluation of the New TGDc-01 ???PRA??? Palpebral Tonometer: Comparison with Contact and non-Contact TonometryOptometry and Vision Science, 2005
- Clinical performance of non‐contact tonometry by Reichert AT550® in glaucomatous patientsOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2003
- Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new non‐contact tonometerOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2002
- Clinical comparison of the ProTon and Tono-Pen tonometers with the Goldmann applanation tonometer.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1994
- Individual Variability in the Diurnal Intraocular Pressure CurveOphthalmology, 1993
- Tono-Pen tonometry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1992
- Accuracy of Intraocular Pressure Measurements with Two Different Tonometers Through Bandage Contact LensesCornea, 1992
- Tono-Pen, a new tonometerInternational Ophthalmology, 1989
- Accuracy and Precision of the Tono-Pen in Measuring Intraocular Pressure After Keratoplasty and Epikeratophakia and in Scarred CorneasArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1988
- Clinical Comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann Applanation TonometerOphthalmology, 1987