Use of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instruments and Their Modification: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report

This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:

• Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report
  Value in Health, 2009
• The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Evaluation of Medical Products for Regulatory Approval
  Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2008
• Patient-Reported Outcomes to Support Medical Product Labeling Claims: FDA Perspective
  Value in Health, 2007
• What Is Sufficient Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures?
  Value in Health, 2007
• Patient-Reported Outcomes: Instrument Development and Selection Issues
  Value in Health, 2007
• Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument Selection: Designing a Measurement Strategy
  Value in Health, 2007
• Documenting the rationale and psychometric characteristics of patient reported outcomes for labeling and promotional claims: the PRO Evidence Dossier
  Quality of Life Research, 2007
• Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments: Theory and Application
  The American Journal of Medicine, 2006
• Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
  The Lancet, 2001
• Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods.
  Psychological Assessment, 1995