The Dutch CISOE-A framework for cytology reporting increases efficacy of screening upon standardisation since 1996
Open Access
- 26 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 57 (4) , 388-393
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2003.011841
Abstract
Aim: To describe the effect of introducing the CISOE-A framework for reporting cervical cytology results, including changes in repeat and referral advice in the Netherlands, on the efficacy of the screening programme. Changes in the distribution of cytological results, the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions, and the detection rate of squamous cervical carcinoma are reported. Methods: The results of all gynaecology cytological and histological examinations, as registered in the nationwide database for histopathology and cytopathology (PALGA) from 1990 to 2000, were retrieved from seven laboratories in the greater Amsterdam area. Results: After the introduction of the CISOE-A classification, cytological results with equivocal diagnoses decreased significantly from 11.3% to 2.6%, without an increase in the percentages of moderate dyskaryosis or worse. During the study period, the detection rate of histologically diagnosed high grade CIN lesions increased significantly from 4.1 to 6.4/1000 smears, whereas there was no change in the detection rates of low grade lesions or invasive cervical cancer. Conclusions: The introduction of the new CISOE-A classification system resulted in a substantial decrease of equivocal results and repeat recommendations, without a decrease in the detection rate of high grade lesions, making the screening programme more efficacious.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening for cervical disease in mature womenCancer, 2002
- 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women With Cervical Cytological AbnormalitiesJAMA, 2002
- The 2001 Bethesda SystemTerminology for Reporting Results of Cervical CytologyJAMA, 2002
- Women who participate in spontaneous screening are not at higher risk for cervical cancer than women who attend programme screeningEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2002
- Criteria for Organized Cervical Screening ProgramsActa Cytologica, 2002
- Changing rates of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix in EnglandThe Lancet, 2001
- Cervical cancer screening in The NetherlandsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2000
- Cervical cytology reported as negative and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: no strong evidence of benefitBritish Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Epidemiological evidence for age-dependent regression of pre-invasive cervical cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 1991
- Natural history of cervical neoplasia: consistent results obtained by an identification techniqueBritish Journal of Cancer, 1989