Translating research into policy and practice in developing countries: a case study of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia
Open Access
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 5 (1) , 68
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-68
Abstract
Background: The evidence base for improving reproductive health continues to grow. However, concerns remain that the translation of this evidence into appropriate policies is partial and slow. Little is known about the factors affecting the use of evidence by policy makers and clinicians, particularly in developing countries. The objective of this study was to examine the factors that might affect the translation of randomised controlled trial (RCT) findings into policies and practice in developing countries. Methods: The recent publication of an important RCT on the use of magnesium sulphate to treat pre-eclampsia provided an opportunity to explore how research findings might be translated into policy. A range of research methods, including a survey, group interview and observations with RCT collaborators and a survey of WHO drug information officers, regulatory officials and obstetricians in 12 countries, were undertaken to identify barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation. Results: It proved difficult to obtain reliable data regarding the availability and use of commonly used drugs in many countries. The perceived barriers to implementing RCT findings regarding the use of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia include drug licensing and availability; inadequate and poorly implemented clinical guidelines; and lack of political support for policy change. However, there were significant regional and national differences in the importance of specific barriers. Conclusion: The policy changes needed to ensure widespread availability and use of magnesium sulphate are variable and complex. Difficulties in obtaining information on availability and use are combined with the wide range of barriers across settings, including a lack of support from policy makers. This makes it difficult to envisage any single intervention strategy that might be used to promote the uptake of research findings on magnesium sulphate into policy across the study settings. The publication of important trials may therefore not have the impacts on health care that researchers hope for.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsiaCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010
- Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsiaCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010
- The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infantsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005
- Changes in Prescribing Patterns Following Publication of the ALLHAT TrialJAMA, 2004
- Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsiaPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsiaPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Research and policy: What determines the relationship?Policy Studies, 1996
- Health Policy: An Introduction to Process and PowerJournal of Public Health Policy, 1995
- Case and Situation AnalysisSociological Review, 1983
- The Many Meanings of Research UtilizationPublic Administration Review, 1979