An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 57 (12) , 1232-1236
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Allocation Concealment in Clinical Trials—ReplyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2002
- Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsBMJ, 2001
- Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2001
- The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized TrialsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996
- Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future DirectionsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklistsControlled Clinical Trials, 1995
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981