Equitable rationing of highly specialised health care services for children: a perspective from South Africa.
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 25 (3) , 224-229
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.3.224
Abstract
The principles of equality and equity, respectively in the Bill of Rights and the white paper on health, provide the moral and legal foundations for future health care for children in South Africa. However, given extreme health care need and scarce resources, the government faces formidable obstacles if it hopes to achieve a just allocation of public health care resources, especially among children in need of highly specialised health care. In this regard, there is a dearth of moral analysis which is practically useful in the South African situation. We offer a set of moral considerations to guide the macro-allocation of highly specialised public health care services among South Africa's children. We also mention moral considerations which should inform micro-allocation.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tensions in setting health care priorities for South Africa's children.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1998
- A New Definition of Children With Special Health Care NeedsPediatrics, 1998
- High cost, low volume care: the case of haemophiliaBMJ, 1997
- Medical futility and the social context.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1997
- What makes a just healthcare system?BMJ, 1996
- Needs, rights, and equity: more quality in healthcare rationing.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1995
- Priorities and rationing: pragmatism or principles?BMJ, 1995
- PRIVATIZATION AND JUST HEALTHCAREBioethics, 1995
- The costs and benefits of a vaccination programme for Haemophilus influenzae type B disease.1995
- Futility and rationingThe American Journal of Medicine, 1992