Comparison of Quality of Multiplanar Reconstructions and Direct Coronal Multidetector CT Scans of the Lung
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 179 (4) , 875-879
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.4.1790875
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of coronal multiplanar reconstructions with the quality of direct coronal thin-section multidetector CT (MDCT) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Axial multidetector CT (MDCT) scans were obtained through the entire lung in 10 normal autopsy lung specimens using an MDCT scanner. Four protocols were used: 0.5-mm collimation with a 0.5-mm reconstruction interval; 0.5-mm collimation with a 0.3-mm reconstruction interval; 1-mm collimation with a 0.5-mm reconstruction interval; and 2-mm collimation with a 1-mm reconstruction interval. Multiplanar reconstruction images with 0.5-mm slice thickness were obtained from the four types of data sets. Direct coronal thin-section CT of the same 10 autopsy lung specimens was performed using 0.5-mm scan collimation, a 0.3-mm reconstruction interval, a 25.6-cm field of view, and a 512 × 512 matrix. Two independent observers compared the image quality of each of the four coronal multiplanar reconstruction sets with that of direct coronal thin-section CT scans. The observers analyzed visualization of anatomic features and artifacts. RESULTS. The total image quality of the multiplanar reconstructions obtained from 0.5-mm collimation data with or without 0.3-mm overlapping reconstruction was equal to that of direct coronal thin-section CT scans in all 20 interpretations. The image quality of multiplanar reconstruction images from 0.5-mm collimation data either with or without overlapping reconstruction was superior to multiplanar reconstruction images obtained from 1- or 2-mm collimation scans (p < 0.01, Fisher's exact test). Stairstep artifacts in multiplanar reconstructions using 0.5-mm collimation without overlapping reconstruction were equal to those with overlapping reconstruction and were fewer than those on 1- or 2-mm collimation (p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSION. The image quality of coronal multiplanar reconstructions from isotropic voxel data obtained using 0.5-mm collimation, with or without overlapping reconstruction, is similar to that of direct coronal thin-section CT scans.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-Resolution CT Using Multidetector CT EquipmentAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Stair-Step Artifacts with Single versus Multiple Detector-Row Helical CTRadiology, 2000
- Petrosal Bone: Coronal Reconstructions from Axial Spiral CT Data Obtained with 0.5-mm Collimation Can Replace Direct Coronal Sequential CT ScansRadiology, 1999
- Temporal bone: comparison of isotropic helical CT and conventional direct axial and coronal CT.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1999
- Multi‐slice helical CT: Scan and reconstructionMedical Physics, 1999
- Thin-section three-dimensional spiral CT: is isotropic imaging possible?Radiology, 1995
- Reconstructed helical CT scans: improvement in z-axis resolution compared with overlapped and nonoverlapped conventional CT scans.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1995
- Stair-step artifacts in three-dimensional helical CT: an experimental study.Radiology, 1994