Levels of Aggregation in Conjoint Analysis: An Empirical Comparison
Open Access
- 1 November 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing Research
- Vol. 17 (4) , 516-523
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700410
Abstract
Two segmented methods of performing conjoint anal/sis, clustered and componential segmentation, are compared with each other as well as with individual level and totally aggregate level analyses. The two segmented methods provide insights to the data that (1) are not obtainable at the aggregate level and (2) are in a form that is more easily communicated than the information from the individual level analysis. The predictive power of the clustered segmentation method is higher than that of componential segmentation, and both are superior to the aggregate analysis but inferior to individual level analysis.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of the Internal Validity of Alternative Parameter Estimation Methods in Decompositional Multiattribute Preference ModelsJournal of Marketing Research, 1979
- Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and OutlookJournal of Consumer Research, 1978
- Issues and Advances in Segmentation ResearchJournal of Marketing Research, 1978
- Analysis of brand preference segmentsJournal of Business Research, 1978
- A new approach to market segmentationBusiness Horizons, 1977
- Superordinate factorial designs in the analysis of consumer judgmentsJournal of Business Research, 1976
- Trade-Off Analysis of Consumer ValuesJournal of Marketing Research, 1974
- Conjoint-measurement analysis of composition rules in psychology.Psychological Review, 1971
- Benefit Segmentation: A Decision-oriented Research ToolJournal of Marketing, 1968
- Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurementJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1964