Initial Experience with 1.5-mm2 High Impedance, Steroid-luting Pacing Electrodes
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 19 (2) , 188-196
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03310.x
Abstract
In this human study, 21 atrial and 62 ventricular 1.5-mm2 unipolar steroid-eluting pacing electrodes were implanted in 64 patients. Pacing thresholds, lead impedance, and sensing measurements were measured via pacemaker telemetry within 24 hours postimplant, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. Acute pacing impedances measured via a pacing systems analyzer were 1,039 +/- 292 (atrial) and 1,268 +/- 313 ohms (ventricular). A 10%-15% decline in the mean telemetered atrial and ventricular pacing impedances was observed at 1 week, but thereafter remained stable. Acute pacing thresholds at 0.5 ms were 0.5 +/- 0.3 V (atrial) and 0.4 +/- 0.1 V (ventricular). Filtered P and R wave amplitudes were 3.7 +/- 2.3 mV and 14.9 +/- 5.9 mV, respectively. In 21 patients, no complications related to the atrial electrode were observed. Of 62 patients with ventricular electrodes, 4 patients (6%) experienced complications and required surgical intervention. On these, causative factors included micro-dislodgment (1 patient), and perforation (1 patient). Sudden unexplained exit block occurred late (> 6 weeks) in two patients. In the remainder of patients, pacing thresholds and sensed electrogram amplitudes remained stable throughout the 52-week follow-up period. The present study validates that smaller surface (i.e., 1.5 mm2) steroid-eluting electrode designs offer excellent pacing and sensing performance with significantly higher pacing impedances. Although questions remain as to the cause of late exit block in two patients in this series, this relatively small surface electrode design offers promise toward achieving greater pacing efficiency and a theoretical 13%-16% (minimum) enhancement in permanent pacemaker longevity.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Steroid‐Eluting Electrodes Really Have Better Performance Than Other State‐of‐the‐Art Designs?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1993
- The Electrode‐Tissue Interface: The Revolutionary Role of Steroid ElutionPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
- Benefits of Smaller Electrode Surface Area (4 mm2) on Steroid-Eluting LeadsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- A New Efficient NanoTip LeadPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- Steroid‐Tipped Leads Versus Porous Platinum Permanent Pacemaker Leads: A Controlled StudyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- Stimulation Characteristics of a Steroid-Eluting Electrode Compared with Three Conventional ElectrodesPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- Clinical Experience with Steroid‐Eluting Unipolar ElectrodesPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- The Porous Titanium Steroid Eluting Electrode: A Double Blind Study Assessing the Stimulation Threshold Effects of SteroidPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Long‐Term Performance of Endocardial Leads with Steroid‐Eluting ElectrodesPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1986
- Acute and Long‐Term Atrial and Ventricular Stimulation Thresholds with a Steroid‐Eluting ElectrodePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1985