The American Psychological Association's amicus curiae brief in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins: The values of science versus the values of the law.
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 17 (2) , 201-215
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01045939
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job typePublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Psychology's influence on constitutional interpretation: A comment on how to succeed.Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- Social science and the courts: The role of amicus curiae briefs.Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- Asserting scientific authority: Cognitive development and adolescent legal rights.American Psychologist, 1989
- The impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendationsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1988
- The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female job applicantsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1988
- Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination: The effects of applicant sex and information type on preliminary employment decisionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984
- Effect of group performance, leader sex, and rater sex on ratings of leader behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1981
- Can we learn anything about interviewing real people from “interviews” of paper people? Two studies of the external validity of a paradigmOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978
- The perceived cause of work success as a mediator of sex discrimination in organizationsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978